Friday, February 27, 2015

Week 7: Class Reading - Hayley

Concepts and Theory of Local Economic Development by Blakely

The most traditional and commonly used definition of economic development is associated with the creation of wealth, which most often includes activities involved in increasing taxes, creating jobs, etc.  This is why economic development needs to be defined much differently.  The author offers a much more long-term focused definition to economic development that might be more suitable.  It focuses on local economic development based on a community’s standard of living, focuses on reducing inequality, and focuses on promoting sustainability.  The author also offers many brief overviews of theories related to economic growth and development, but explains further five theories that have been influential in understanding economic development.

The first theory is neoclassical economic theory.  This theory asserts that all economic systems will reach a state of equilibrium if capital flows without restrictions.  The issue with this is this model does not work perfectly.  The community must use its resources to attract capital, which it may not be doing, and disadvantaged communities should look to get resources to reach equilibrium of surrounding communities, which is much easier said than done.

The second theory is economic base theory, which focuses on export.  This theory poses the thought that economic growth is based on a community’s outside demand for certain goods, services, and resources.  If local resources produce goods that can be exported, then that community will achieve economic growth.  This theory is helpful in understanding how exportation affects local economy, but does not focus on internal community demands.

The third theory is the product cycle theory.  This theory says that there is a cycle, beginning in areas of greater wealth, where specialized labor is used to create a product.  This product stays in this area of greater wealth until it is standardized and can be produced in areas with less wealth and more standardized labor.  It is important to remember with this theory that different labor industries move at different speeds, therefore requiring different amounts of intensity.

Location theories are focused on how firms choose their location.  This choice is typically influenced by production costs, transportation costs, resources, and space.  It is much different for different firms; therefore this theory is used more specifically.

Central place theory asserts the idea that a central area (typically an urban center) is supported by smaller places that provide it with resources.  It is most easily associated with retail and helps us to pick viable centers for supporting communities.

The author also introduces models in which economic development has affected practice.  The first is through attraction models which are used in development-seeking communities that are viewed as products.  It is focused on marketing communities to attract entrepreneurial firms.  The second is through New Market Models, which are focused more on poor and rural areas.  This model believes that these communities have potential for economic opportunity, but are not being utilized appropriately.  It focuses on the long-term, community assets, and finding ways to share the wealth, which is something we want to strongly influence economic development theory.

Finally, the author presents more modern components of economic development, which includes locality, business and economic base, employment resources, and community resources.  These concepts have been reformulated to focus on the community’s long-term standard of living, focus on reducing inequality, and focus on promoting sustainability.  Economic development theory must continue to change and evolve to keep up with the changing society and its challenging trends.

4 comments:

  1. I believe neoclassical economic theory doesn't work as proscribed in this era due to the penchant for those in control of wealth to try and hold on to more of it through low wages for employees, exportation of specialised jobs, high prices for customers and other methods. Capital can't flow because the restriction is the capitalist her/his self. That person's overriding aim is to amass as much wealth for themselves as possible. When money is concentrated, there is less of it to move through the economy. As far as a community controlling it's capital, the neoclassical model can work as long as no community "fiefdoms" emerge to compete for and capture the majority of assets for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that having job opportunities within you community is so important to the sustainability of the economy. After visiting JVL and hearing first-hand experiences about residents wanting employment but having no transportation to get to said jobs, I can see how this can become a major threat to the economic stability of a community.
    Also, having resources available to the community such as grocery stores that offer fresh produce hinders the health and well-being of residents who wish to contribute more. I believe that these are basic rights that all communities should have and it is tough knowing our communities right here in St. Louis are going without these needs being met. Lacking proper transportation seems to be a theme here, and I am interested in learning more about rural transportation resources on this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hayley, thank you for your summary and overview of the article. The material was a lot to shift through, so I especially appreciated reading this blog post. Your last sentence was an “ah ha!” moment for me: “Economic development theory must continue to change and evolve to keep up with the changing society and its challenging trends.” The way were think about economic growth and development in St. Louis, and in the larger America, is key for us to continue to achieve progress. Over the past 60 years, every census the population of St. Louis City decreased. Each census, city developers and people invented in this community watch those numbers closely, hoping to see an increase, but that has yet to happen. (Perhaps in 2020?!?) St. Louis is starting to attract tech. companies and smaller start-ups. The low cost of living is starting to attract new businesses (and new types of businesses) that are needed for our city to grow.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the New Market Models. I think that subsidizing retailers and other business to grow in low-income areas can lead to positive economic growth overall. It would provide additional revenue from taxes, additional jobs, and improve the quality of life in these areas. One sizable obstacle to overcome, is obtaining the money needed because it would most likely need to be a stimulus from the federal government, which may be hard to receive. Overall, this is my favorite economic model that I believe should be implemented more often.

    ReplyDelete